Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Top 10 States for Entrepreneurs
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community     Chit Chat About Anything  ›  Top 10 States for Entrepreneurs Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 73 Guests

Top 10 States for Entrepreneurs  This thread currently has 1,401 views. |
2 Pages 1 2 » Recommend Thread
Box A Rox
September 2, 2011, 6:44am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
According to the latest State Entrepreneurship Index published by the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, states in the Northeast and Northwest are the most favorable for entrepreneurs:

#5 Oregon
#4 New Jersey
#3 Massachusetts
#2 Washington
#1 New York

The worst?
#46 Alabama
#47 Nevada
#48 Mississippi
#49 Arizona
#50 South Carolina

(Probably just a coincidence, but the best states to start a business are Blue states, and the worst, Red States!)

(University of Nebraska-Lincoln)
http://bbr.unl.edu/documents/State_Entrepreneurship_Index_July2011.pdf


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message
Shadow
September 2, 2011, 6:56am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
10 Best States for Small Businesses

According to the study results, here are the state the rank highest for small business entrepreneurs:

    South Dakota (Best)
    Nevada
    Texas
    Wyoming
    Washington
    Florida
    South Carolina
    Colorado
    Alabama
    Virginia
http://homebusiness.about.com/od/getstarted/a/best-states-for-small-business-09.htm
Logged
Private Message Reply: 1 - 29
Box A Rox
September 2, 2011, 7:08am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Two lists.  One compiled by an advocacy group... (similar to the Chamber of Commerce) that has a political agenda, the other by University of Nebraska-Lincoln, that gathers and  studies statistics, and data.

It's up to you to decide which you consider more accurate and valid.


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 29
MobileTerminal
September 2, 2011, 7:17am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted Text
http://cehs.unl.edu/100years/#

Student Research Conference

8:30 to 3:00 - Teachers College Hall (no charge)

The conference will begin with a continental breakfast, followed by a 9 AM keynote address by Professor Bill Ayers, Distinguished Professor of Education and Senior University Scholar University of Illinois at Chicago. His talk is entitled, “We are Each Other’s Keepers: Research to Change the World.” The day will include breakout sessions of graduate and undergraduate student research projects, faculty panels, a poster session and a complimentary lunch. You can participate by encouraging students to submit their work, by prompting students to come and most importantly, by attending yourself to exchange ideas and demonstrate your support of our students. Our goal is have representation from every department and for students to experience the intellectual excitement of the CEHS scholarly community.



Quoted Text
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list      Thu Oct-16-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Damn pinko commie fellow travelers
     
I used to live in Lincoln and, like all Nebraska, it's a hotbed for far-left radicalism, virulent anti-Americanism and kneejerk hatred of anything to do with W. The place makes Berkely look like the John Birch Society.





http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x7480284
Logged
E-mail Reply: 3 - 29
MobileTerminal
September 2, 2011, 7:18am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted Text
Rebecca Carr has donated $350 to Sen. Barack Obama's presidential campaign. The decision to give money was an easy one for her: She wants a Democrat in the White House.

And after the 2000 election, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln senior analyst in academic affairs said she realized how important it was to have one person in the White House over another.

"So I think certainly in my case, and more generally," she said, "people are more aware of the importance of the presidential race and thus are more willing to spend money and time to get behind the person they believe in."

Carr is just one of many University of Nebraska employees who donated money to a presidential campaign this year, according to a Daily Nebraskan analysis of Federal Election Commission records through early March. The paper obtained a list of every person employed by the NU system and matched it with FEC data to determine who contributed to a political party.

University of Nebraska employees donated $68,411 to various presidential candidates, which amounts to almost 8 percent of Nebraska's donations.

Overall, the state donated $893,968 to all of the candidates. Democrats received $480,227, Republicans $413,691.

Former Democratic candidate John Edwards received the most money - $23,923 - from NU employees. Obama received $22,206, and Sen. Hillary Clinton got $5,945.


http://www.dailynebraskan.com/news/democrats-get-most-donations-from-nu-faculty-1.278439
Logged
E-mail Reply: 4 - 29
Shadow
September 2, 2011, 7:23am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
he top 15 business-friendly states
March 8, 2011 by Alex Irwin
Posted in: Regulatory, Special Report


The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has released a report that makes a bold claim: Regulatory burdens are keeping nearly 750,000 jobs from being created in the U.S. It also lists the best states for business. Is yours on the list?

The report, “The Impact of State Employment Policies on Job Growth” calls on states to reduce regulations the Chamber says are preventing employers from hiring workers.

The report also separated states into three categories — good, fair and poor — based on current standards and workplace regulations.

The “good” states that are the most business friendly:

    Alabama
    Florida
    Georgia
    Idaho
    Kansas
    Mississippi
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    Oklahoma
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia

The report goes on to detail the effects of labor issues like minimum wage and litigation and enforcement on businesses. Reviews of individual states’ policies are also included. In addition to the 750,000 new jobs, the Chamber estimates that reduced regulatory burdens could lead to the creation of 50,000 businesses a year.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 5 - 29
55tbird
September 2, 2011, 7:27am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
3,211
Reputation
91.67%
Reputation Score
+11 / -1
Time Online
209 days 13 hours 13 minutes
All I can say is look at the exodus of people from NY and the northeast in general for the last 10 years... that says more than ANY study by the Chamber or an academic institution.


"Arguing with liberals is like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock out the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it is victorious." - Author Unknown
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 6 - 29
Box A Rox
September 2, 2011, 7:28am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
It appears that MT has posted the opinions of two individuals.  Very good MT.  But what is the significance of the opinion of two people???

It was interesting to notice how even the donations were from any institution.  It appears the University is evenly split between Republicans and Democrats:

"Overall, the state donated $893,968 to all of the candidates. Democrats received $480,227, Republicans $413,691"


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 7 - 29
Box A Rox
September 2, 2011, 7:32am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from Shadow
he top 15 business-friendly states
March 8, 2011 by Alex Irwin
Posted in: Regulatory, Special Report


The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has released a report that makes a bold claim: Regulatory burdens are keeping nearly 750,000 jobs from being created in the U.S. It also lists the best states for business. Is yours on the list?

The report, “The Impact of State Employment Policies on Job Growth” calls on states to reduce regulations the Chamber says are preventing employers from hiring workers.

The report also separated states into three categories — good, fair and poor — based on current standards and workplace regulations.

The “good” states that are the most business friendly:

    Alabama
    Florida
    Georgia
    Idaho
    Kansas
    Mississippi
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    Oklahoma
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia

The report goes on to detail the effects of labor issues like minimum wage and litigation and enforcement on businesses. Reviews of individual states’ policies are also included. In addition to the 750,000 new jobs, the Chamber estimates that reduced regulatory burdens could lead to the creation of 50,000 businesses a year.



Shadow
A question...
Do you consider the US Chamber of Commerce to be a non biased, non political, fair and balanced group?  Or Do you consider it to be a very biased, very political group that advocates for one particular agenda?

IMO, The national US C of C is 100% advocating for the Republican party.  (Just google the CofC for news on this issue.)





The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 8 - 29
MobileTerminal
September 2, 2011, 7:34am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted from Box A Rox
It appears that MT has posted the opinions of two individuals.  Very good MT.  But what is the significance of the opinion of two people???

It was interesting to notice how even the donations were from any institution.  It appears the University is evenly split between Republicans and Democrats:

"Overall, the state donated $893,968 to all of the candidates. Democrats received $480,227, Republicans $413,691"




Overall, the state donated $893,968 to all of the candidates


The question is the college, not the state.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 9 - 29
Box A Rox
September 2, 2011, 7:43am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from 147

Overall, the state donated $893,968 to all of the candidates
The question is the college, not the state.


OK,  maybe I didn't understand your post.
You posted:
"University of Nebraska employees donated $68,411 to various presidential candidates, which amounts to almost 8 percent of Nebraska's donations."

U of N employees would probably contain very many political, educated, and wealthy individuals.  The fact that they donated to a political party is not surprising, and many being wealthy, the amount would probably be higher than average.
What is the point?  Did they donate to Democrats or Republicans or Independents??? It doesn't say.






The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 10 - 29
MobileTerminal
September 2, 2011, 7:49am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted from Box A Rox


OK,  maybe I didn't understand your post.
You posted:
"University of Nebraska employees donated $68,411 to various presidential candidates, which amounts to almost 8 percent of Nebraska's donations."

U of N employees would probably contain very many political, educated, and wealthy individuals.  The fact that they donated to a political party is not surprising, and many being wealthy, the amount would probably be higher than average.
What is the point?  Did they donate to Democrats or Republicans or Independents??? It doesn't say.




It doesn't say?  Perhaps a refresher in Reading Comprehension?  



Rebecca Carr has donated $350 to Sen. Barack Obama's presidential campaign. The decision to give money was an easy one for her: She wants a Democrat in the White House.

And after the 2000 election, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln senior analyst in academic affairs said she realized how important it was to have one person in the White House over another.





Quoted Text
It also doesn't surprise Wagner that more money went to Democrats because he said professors tend to be more liberal.

...

University employees across the country have donated large amounts of money, according to political watchdog Web sites including Opensecrets.org. Some schools, such as Yale and Harvard University, donated almost exclusively to Democrats, and in large numbers.



http://www.dailynebraskan.com/news/democrats-get-most-donations-from-nu-faculty-1.278439
Logged
E-mail Reply: 11 - 29
55tbird
September 2, 2011, 8:14am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
3,211
Reputation
91.67%
Reputation Score
+11 / -1
Time Online
209 days 13 hours 13 minutes
No one lives in a vacuum... EVERYONE has a political bias...
Surveys show Academics, press, minorities and union members typically vote democratic.
While businessmen, military, rural residents and certain christian denominations vote republican.

To say these biases don't exist is being intellectually dishonest.


"Arguing with liberals is like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock out the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it is victorious." - Author Unknown
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 12 - 29
Box A Rox
September 2, 2011, 8:25am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from 147



It doesn't say?  Perhaps a refresher in Reading Comprehension?  



Rebecca Carr has donated $350 to Sen. Barack Obama's presidential campaign. The decision to give money was an easy one for her: She wants a Democrat in the White House.

And after the 2000 election, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln senior analyst in academic affairs said she realized how important it was to have one person in the White House over another.







http://www.dailynebraskan.com/news/democrats-get-most-donations-from-nu-faculty-1.278439



OK, One person, Rebecca Carr has donated $350 to Sen. Barack Obama.  This has significance to you???

There may be a hundred people just like her who donated to his opponent... either way??? You draw some valid conclusion from one womans opinion???


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 13 - 29
GrahamBonnet
September 2, 2011, 8:57am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
9,643
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+16 / -8
Time Online
131 days 7 hours 47 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox
Two lists.  One compiled by an advocacy group... (similar to the Chamber of Commerce) that has a political agenda, the other by University of Nebraska-Lincoln, that gathers and  studies statistics, and data.

It's up to you to decide which you consider more accurate and valid.


TWO LISTS. One compiled by a group of pie-in-the-sky academics who never met a payroll and wouldn't know a 14 hours day if it kicked them in the tw@t, the other by a group of business people who have spent their lives being persecuted and run down, vilified, over-taxes, harassed by penny-ante bureaucrats and regulators, overburdened by regulators and government men, treated as the modern day equivalent of the Jews in Germany in 1933, and are legally discriminated in every form or fashion by THE GOVERNMENT.

It is up to you to decide which you consider more accurate and valid.


Any entrepreneur who sets up in NY when they don't have to or doesn't get a gigantic pile of cash through political connections (ala' Metroplex) needs some form of therapy. But of course the numbers don't lie. If we were number one for entrepreneurial activity then this state would be flush with new business start ups. I find it amusing how liberal progressive communists think if they lie to themselves they will make everything all better. They sit around and lie to each other and themselves, even in their studies. Is that a symptom of mental illness or what?


"While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat."
Logged
Private Message Reply: 14 - 29
2 Pages 1 2 » Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread