Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
china's media censorship.....sound familiar?
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    What's Going On In The Rest Of The world  ›  china's media censorship.....sound familiar? Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 25 Guests

china's media censorship.....sound familiar?  This thread currently has 861 views. |
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
bumblethru
August 1, 2011, 1:20pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
http://news.yahoo.com/china-media-reins-criticism-over-train-crash-014727195.html

Quoted Text
China train crash censorship scorned on Internet
ReutersBy Chris Buckley | Reuters – 9 hrs ago


BEIJING (Reuters) - China's media are curbing combative reporting of a high-speed train disaster after what observers said were orders from the ruling Communist Party's propaganda arm, which on Monday drew fresh scorn from Internet users demanding unfettered news.

For a week, many Chinese newspapers defied censorship pressure and pursued unusually aggressive reporting of the July 23 crash that killed at least 40 people on two high-speed trains -- a technology the government had promoted as a shiny symbol of the nation's growing technological prowess.

Censors have stepped up demands for news media to wind down often withering criticism over the train disaster near Wenzhou, in eastern China, according to the China Media Project at the University of Hong Kong.

But in a sign of the power of China's Internet to challenge state controls, users of Sina.com's Weibo site (http://weibo.com),

the nations most popular version of Twitter, posted messages denouncing the clampdown. Some cited Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao's vow last week to pursue the truth about the accident openly and thoroughly.

"Why have the people been robbed of the right to know? How long do they want to hide," said one comment on Sina's Weibo site. "We won't accept being treated like idiots."

Chinese newspapers and magazines are all ultimately controlled by different arms of the state, but they compete for stories, readers and revenue in a fiercely commercial environment, encouraging more adventurous editors to skirt around, even sometimes defy, censorship.

The angry and instant tide of Internet opinion was making it harder for censors to smother news, said Lu Yuegang, a former investigative reporter for the Party-run China Youth Daily who denounced censorship and was removed from his job.

"These days, efforts to seal off the flow of opinion can't work like it did before," Lu said in a telephone interview.

"These crude censorship steps used to have some effect, but now the speed of the flow of information has surpassed them. On the contrary, the word about such restrictions simply deepens people's distrust in government."

CENSORSHIP PUSH

The Chinese Communist Party's Department of Propaganda often issues orders to editors and producers about what news topics are forbidden and how subjects should be reported.

"A notice demanded that Chinese media immediately cool down their reporting and commentary on the July 23 Wenzhou train crash, and scores of Chinese media had to move frantically to fill the gaps as planned reports on the crash were suddenly off limits," Qian Gang and David Bandurski of the China Media Project wrote in a comment about the fresh censorship push that they said began on Friday.

On Monday, several popular newspapers at the forefront of reporting the train disaster had shifted to more upbeat news, including a Chinese world record at the world swimming championships in Shanghai.

Qian and Bandurski showed several Chinese newspaper columns and commentaries that were quashed and never appeared after the censors stepped in (http://cmp.hku.hk).

"The only path to re-establishing public confidence is thoroughly investigating the truth," was the title of one quashed editorial in China Business View.

Weibo and other homegrown micro-blogging sites have served as lively arenas for public outrage over the train accident.

Thirty-seven percent of China's Internet users, or up to 125 million people, use micro-blogging sites, said a December report from iResearch, a Chinese consulting firm.

The Twitter-like Chinese websites allow users to shoot out bursts of 140 or so Chinese characters of often strongly worded opinion. Twitter itself is blocked in China, along with Facebook and other social media websites that are popular abroad.

Many Chinese citizens have used the Internet to lambast what they have called government efforts to cover up culpability for putting expanding high-speed train lines ahead of safety and then covering up aspects of the disaster.

"The Wenzhou train crash finally created an opportunity for people to speak out openly," wrote one Weibo user.

Officials have blamed faulty signal technology for the crash, but many commentators on the Internet have said China's high-speed rail push has much deeper problems, and some have accused officials of elaborate efforts to hide evidence.

"Whatever (comments) you cut, we'll post again," said one message on Weibo, which often removes comments deemed too critical of the government. "I really don't understand what the government thinks it can hide."

(Reporting by Chris Buckley; Editing by Ken Wills and Alex Richardson)


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message
CICERO
August 1, 2011, 2:04pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Unlike Communist China, in fascist America, it is large corporations that sensor speech. The media outlets that are friendly to the Democrat party just kick you off the air for disparaging remarks directed at the dear leader.  Just ask Mark Halprin.  Or another good example would be Juan Williams that was booted from NPR by the speech police.  It’s pretty scary isn’t it?

BTW, has Halprin resurfaced anywhere?  


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1 - 7
Box A Rox
August 1, 2011, 2:50pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Censorship Sucks!

A case in point...
        After a five-week trial and six hours of deliberation which ended August 18, 2000, a Florida state court jury unanimously determined that Fox News "acted intentionally and deliberately to falsify or distort the plaintiffs' news reporting on BGH."  In that decision, the jury also found that Jane's threat to blow the whistle on Fox's misconduct to the FCC was the sole reason for the termination... and the jury awarded $425,000 in damages which makes her eligible to apply for reimbursement for all court costs, expenses and legal fees.

        The whistle-blowing journalists, twice refused Fox offers of big-money deals to keep quiet about what they knew, filed their landmark lawsuit April 2, 1998 and survived three Fox efforts to have their case summarily dismissed.  It is the first time journalists have used a whistleblower law to seek a legal remedy for being fired by for refusing to distort the news.


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 7
Box A Rox
August 1, 2011, 2:54pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Fox News Censorship of Ron Paul



The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 7
CICERO
August 1, 2011, 3:19pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
If you're trying to get an argument out of me box, think again.  I'm not going to be sucked into the sensless fox vs msnbc battle for who is worst.  Wasn't there a thread yesterday where MSNBC openly barred a "tea party" congressman?  It's corporatism and fascism in modern America.  People need to wake up.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 7
Box A Rox
August 2, 2011, 6:35am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from CICERO
If you're trying to get an argument out of me box, think again.  I'm not going to be sucked into the sensless fox vs msnbc battle for who is worst.  


I was responding to bumble's post, not yours.  Do you just assume that everything is about you???



The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 5 - 7
CICERO
August 2, 2011, 7:38am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


I was responding to bumble's post, not yours.  Do you just assume that everything is about you???



Maybe because Bumble's post was about censorship in China and my post was about censorship in America.  Your FOX post was more in line with my post about American news organizations being controlled by America's two major political parties.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 6 - 7
bumblethru
August 2, 2011, 11:34am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
Boxy.................the article, in my opinion, just reflected how the media is allowing itself to be censored/controlled by both the left and right representing our government. It was meant as a generalization...........k?


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 7 - 7
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread