Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
NATO refuses to take over no-fly zone in Libya
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community     Chit Chat About Anything  ›  NATO refuses to take over no-fly zone in Libya Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
Googlebot and 68 Guests

NATO refuses to take over no-fly zone in Libya  This thread currently has 167 views. |
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
55tbird
March 23, 2011, 2:32pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
3,211
Reputation
91.67%
Reputation Score
+11 / -1
Time Online
209 days 13 hours 13 minutes
Nice job Barry... now we're stuck with it or we look like fools if we drop it and let Kadaffy win.

Why don't you take Michelle and the girls on another vacation?


"Arguing with liberals is like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock out the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it is victorious." - Author Unknown
Logged Offline
Private Message
Henry
March 23, 2011, 3:54pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,058
Reputation
85.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -3
Time Online
2114 days 9 hours 31 minutes
Good get our forces and equipment the hell out of there. Nobody knows what the goal of these bombing and no fly zones were supposed to do any ways. The rebels made no solid ground and Gaddafi was never a target of these strikes. This is nothing but a waste of money and time not to mention unconstitutional. What nobody is talking about either is that our troops shot 6 rebels that were trying to help our soldiers who went down the other day. With screw ups like that the anger will be turned against us yet again.


"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1 - 7
MobileTerminal
March 25, 2011, 8:55am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Just remember folks, this isn't a war, it's just a kinetic military action; and it's not global warming, it's climate change; and it's not abortion it's choice; and it's not liberal it's progressive.

(taken from a user comment at: http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/262910/obama-no-us-forces-ground-libya-except-those-guys)
Logged
E-mail Reply: 2 - 7
Box A Rox
March 25, 2011, 9:11am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 7
55tbird
March 25, 2011, 9:51am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
3,211
Reputation
91.67%
Reputation Score
+11 / -1
Time Online
209 days 13 hours 13 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


Who do you think the "meat" of NATO is?
AND, the US still is running all of the close in attacks on Kadaffy ground forces...
My son is in Italy (USAF) working 16 hour days maintaining and repairing the F-16 munitions systems as part of this effort.

Once again, the US takes the dangerous end of the stick from a Useless Nations..umm, I mean United Nations resolution


"Arguing with liberals is like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock out the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it is victorious." - Author Unknown
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 7
MobileTerminal
March 25, 2011, 6:16pm Report to Moderator
Guest User

Quoted Text

(Reuters) - A NATO decision to take charge of a no-fly zone over Libya does not include conducting air strikes against Muammar Gaddafi's ground forces, a mission that will remain in U.S. hands until a new command deal is reached, Vice Admiral Bill Gortney said on Friday.

Gortney, chief of the U.S. military's Joint Staff, said the U.N.-backed operation against Gaddafi's forces involved three different missions -- an arms embargo, a no-fly zone and protecting Libyan civilians.

He said the U.S. military initially assumed command of all three missions in order to quickly implement the U.N. resolution authorizing the action. But President Barack Obama and other U.S. officials made it clear the United States would hand off control of the operation as soon as feasible.

The Western alliance already has assumed control of the arms embargo, led by an Italian vice admiral, and has agreed to take over the no-fly zone in coming days, Gortney said. But there is disagreement over the third mission, which includes air strikes to stop Gaddafi from attacking his opponents.

"This mission will remain in U.S. hands until such time as the coalition is ready to assume it," Gortney told a briefing at the Pentagon. "My expectation is that it, too, could fall under NATO. But ... these are decisions and discussions ongoing at the political level and I just would not speculate right now where it will end up."




http://www.reuters.com/article.....p;rpc=22&sp=true
Logged
E-mail Reply: 5 - 7
MobileTerminal
March 25, 2011, 6:17pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted Text
WASHINGTON (AP) -- To a nation and a Congress seeking answers, President Barack Obama on Monday will offer his most expansive explanation of the U.S. role in the Libyan war, delivering a speech that is expected to cover the path ahead and his rationale about the appropriate use of force.

Obama's 7:30 p.m. EDT speech, to be given from the National Defense University in Washington, comes as leading Republican lawmakers and some from his own party have pressed him for clarity about the goals and exit strategy of the United States. Obama and top U.S. security officials spent about an hour talking to lawmakers on Friday, with the president answering direct questions from critics.


http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/s.....=2011-03-25-19-07-00
Logged
E-mail Reply: 6 - 7
senders
March 26, 2011, 10:37am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
we are just doing the dirty work of the arab nations INABILITY to control the extremist religious morons....they have to save face because these years
they REFUSE to slap 'em down......that is why religion SHOULD ALWAYS REMAIN PERSONAL and NOT a national agenda.....the rich leaders of the middle
east sat around in their comfy palaces and fly around jet setting ALL OVER THE WORLD including America and really didn't care what their plebs were
doing....as long as no one looked up their skirts........

America does a better job at keeping their skirts down.....the plebs haven't seen the whole picture, but with the new media of the W.W.W. they have
to move faster.....


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 7 - 7
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
|

Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community     Chit Chat About Anything  ›  NATO refuses to take over no-fly zone in Libya

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread