The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
New Ox-Am Dictionary Names 'Teabagger' Word of the Year Finalist 2009
Among the "words of the year" were: # birther - a conspiracy theorist who challenges President Obama's US birth certificate
# death panel - a theoretical body that determines which patients deserve to live, when care is rationed
# teabagger - a person who protests President Obama's tax policies and stimulus package, often through local demonstrations known as "Tea Party" protests (in allusion to the Boston Tea Party of 1773
If this definition is good enough for the New Oxford American Dictionary, then it's good enough for me. The definition DOESN'T say it is an 'offensive term'. SO, TeaBaggers... get over it!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
That description was not even in the dictionary until after it was used in a unkindly way by the liberal media on their talk shows. The current definition was created in 2009 to provide cover and to quell the disgust created by the likes of Olberman, Maddow, and Mathews. In 2009, the Tea Party movement formed to protest new U.S. tax policies, referencing the Boston Tea Party for its name. The appellation "teabagger" emerged, prompting puns by both commentators and protesters based on its sexual connotation.[15][16] The president of the Media Research Center said that jokes made during CNN and MSNBC broadcasts were insulting.[17]
That description was not even in the dictionary until after it was used in a unkindly way by the liberal media on their talk shows. The current definition was created in 2009 to provide cover and to quell the disgust created by the likes of Olberman, Maddow, and Mathews. In 2009, the Tea Party movement formed to protest new U.S. tax policies, referencing the Boston Tea Party for its name. The appellation "teabagger" emerged, prompting puns by both commentators and protesters based on its sexual connotation.[15][16] The president of the Media Research Center said that jokes made during CNN and MSNBC broadcasts were insulting.[17]
The media, including Olberman & Maddow, RESPONDED to the word "teabagger" being used BY THE TEA PARTY MEMBERS DESCRIBING THEMSELVES.... not the other way around.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
If you're insinuating racism, which most Libs reach for when they don't agree with something, there is a black Tea Party... its called the NAACP.
"Arguing with liberals is like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock out the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it is victorious." - Author Unknown
TeaBaggers show up at a rally with signs saying "GUNS TOMORROW" thinking it's "cute" or at least acceptable. If a group of Blacks showed up at a rally with signs saying "GUNS TOMORROW" , it would be perceived by many as a threat. Why the difference?
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
If this definition is good enough for the New Oxford American Dictionary, then it's good enough for me. The definition DOESN'T say it is an 'offensive term'. SO, TeaBaggers... get over it!
Oxford Dictionaries
marriage
1 the formal union of a man and a woman, typically as recognized by law, by which they become husband and wife: she has three children from a previous marriage
1 the formal union of a man and a woman, typically as recognized by law, by which they become husband and wife: she has three children from a previous marriage
NOPE! That's a marriage, and TeaBaggers are TeaBaggers!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
1 the formal union of a man and a woman, typically as recognized by law, by which they become husband and wife: she has three children from a previous marriage
1 the formal union of a man and a woman, typically as "RECOGNIZED BY LAW,"
Laws are changed every day, as in California's Prop8.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
1 the formal union of a man and a woman, typically as "RECOGNIZED BY LAW,"
Laws are changed every day, as in California's Prop8.
But the law can never recognize marriage between a man and a man without changing the definition of marriage. That's the point of the argument. Two men can't be "married" to each other. Two women can't be "married" to each other. As the current definition stands.
The left is hell bent on further destroying one of the most important building blocks of society by social re-engineering and redefining the 2000+ year old definition of marriage.
And the" current definition" may be obsolete in a few years.
Words change... Laws change... And some minds change...
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith