White House offered Joe Sestak unpaid advisory board position
I noted below that the White House asked Bill Clinton to meet with Joe Sestak to gauge whether he'd be open to alternatives other than running for Senate.
Now I've got some detail on precisely what alternatives were discussed.
According to a source familiar with the situation, the White House asked Clinton and his adviser, lawyer Doug Band, to suggest to Sestak an unpaid position on the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board.
This is similar to what The New York Times' Peter Baker was told by sources, and Baker adds that the White House counsel looked at the the offer and concluded it wasn't illegal:
The office of Robert F. Bauer, the White House counsel, has concluded that Mr. Emanuel's proposal did not violate laws prohibiting government employees from promising employment as a reward for political activity because the position being offered was unpaid. The office also found other examples of presidents offering positions to political allies to achieve political aims.
That dovetails with what I'm hearing the White House has concluded.
The fact that this is an unpaid position could be key. I've checked in with a good government expert to gauge this latest, and will update you when I hear back.
UPDATE, 12:02 p.m.: Here's the official response from the White House counsel on what happened. The White House says, as noted above, that it asked Clinton to suggest to Sestak an unpaid advisory board position.
The White House's response says no secretary of the Navy gig was discussed, and that this sort of offer has happened numerous times in past administrations.
Also: Melanie Sloan, the executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, says there's no "there" here. This couldn't be bribery, she says, because the position was unpaid.
Beyond that, Sloan adds, the Federal bribery statute requires an offer of something of value in exchange for an official act. Sloan says that not running for Senate would not constitute an official act in any case, even if a paid position were offered in return for dropping a run for office.
And: Sam Stein has more new detail, including the interesting fact that the White House looked into this and reached its conclusion over two months ago, making one wonder why they didn't put this to rest earlier.
Cover Up? People are asked all the time to serve in govt... as ambassadors, or in specific missions such as George Mitchell in N. Ireland, or Hillary Clinton as sec of state. The preliminary invitations are usually behind the scenes to establish weather there is interest or if there are specific conditions if they accept.
For a Coverup... See: ~ Oliver North-Iran Contra. ~ Bill Clinton- Monica. ~ Bush/Cheney - Valarie Plame etc etc etc.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Why would a person already in Congress want a non paying job, why did it take so long to answer the question in the first place unless they putting their story together, and why would Clinton offer a job when he has no authority to offer said job? When your administration has a record of not telling the truth it tends to cast doubt on your answers.
May 28, 2010 4:27 PM GOP Calls for FBI Investigation in Sestak Case Posted by Brian Montopoli
(Credit: CBS/AP) Updated 5:04 p.m. Eastern Time
Here's more evidence that the GOP is trying to keep the Joe Sestak affair alive despite today's White House memo denying wrongdoing: A group of Republicans have sent a letter to FBI Director Robert Mueller asking for an FBI investigation of "allegations that White House officials bribed Representative Joe Sestak with promises of a senior Administration position in exchange for his withdrawal from the Pennsylvania Senate primary."
The letter comes from House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Lamar Smith and House Oversight and Government Ranking Member Darrell Issa and Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee; in it, they write that "the White House makes no effort to deny" that a conversation between Bill Clinton and Sestak about withdrawing from the primary took place.
While that's true, the White House maintains that there was nothing improper about the conversation and that it comports to the behavior of past administrations. (Backers of the administration have been pointing to a purported Associated Press story detailing how Sen. S.I. Hayakawa "spurned a Reagan administration suggestion that if he drops out of the crowded Republican Senate primary race in California, President Reagan would find him a job.")
Sestak, who has backed the White House version of events, spoke to reporters late this afternoon. Asked by CBS News how he feels about being put in the position he finds himself in, he replied, "I understand that Washington DC is often about these deals. I didn't feel good bad or indifferent. I just said no and moved on.".............>>>>..............>>>>...............http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20006328-503544.html
May 28, 2010 4:27 PM GOP Calls for FBI Investigation in Sestak Case Posted by Brian Montopoli
(Credit: CBS/AP) Updated 5:04 p.m. Eastern Time
Here's more evidence that the GOP is trying to keep the Joe Sestak affair alive despite today's White House memo denying wrongdoing: A group of Republicans have sent a letter to FBI Director Robert Mueller asking for an FBI investigation of "allegations that White House officials bribed Representative Joe Sestak with promises of a senior Administration position in exchange for his withdrawal from the Pennsylvania Senate primary."
The letter comes from House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Lamar Smith and House Oversight and Government Ranking Member Darrell Issa and Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee; in it, they write that "the White House makes no effort to deny" that a conversation between Bill Clinton and Sestak about withdrawing from the primary took place.
While that's true, the White House maintains that there was nothing improper about the conversation and that it comports to the behavior of past administrations. (Backers of the administration have been pointing to a purported Associated Press story detailing how Sen. S.I. Hayakawa "spurned a Reagan administration suggestion that if he drops out of the crowded Republican Senate primary race in California, President Reagan would find him a job.")
Sestak, who has backed the White House version of events, spoke to reporters late this afternoon. Asked by CBS News how he feels about being put in the position he finds himself in, he replied, "I understand that Washington DC is often about these deals. I didn't feel good bad or indifferent. I just said no and moved on.".............>>>>..............>>>>...............http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20006328-503544.html