So, HOW MANY pseudonyms does our Kelly hide behind, anyway?????!!!!! Talk about a fraud!!!!!

I am Mertzie!  Thought we established that a long time ago...GEEZ...

Quoted from senders

POA is in effect when someone is deemed incompetent(by court) OR dead(as per death certificate)

POA's can be in effect for all types of scenerios, not just mental incompetency.  The POA ends upon the
decedents death.  

Quoted from 1160

OK Peeper's here it is plain and simple, a notaries duty is to WITNESS the signature of any person asking to have a signature notarized. DONE! PERIOD! I have been telling the know it all of Rottendam DV (never seen such an uninformed person in my life)the same as I will tell you, to me this is not about EE or any individual, it is about the responsibilty of a notary.  My signifigent other is a notary and much like the amazing individual you and DV are screaming for she was asked to help a shut-in with a notary signature.  So she said, yes I will be happy to help, when can we go to their house and take care of it.  That is what she did, plain and simple, knowing who you are I think you will get that, know who DV is, please I am done trying to explain to him.  So as for all the set-up crap and who did or didn't do something, please, EE is a nice lady, got it, but no person signing in front of her, she simply should have said sorry I can't do that.  It is indeed Black and White.ANd one last time no matter who did this type of action as a notary I would feel the same way and would tell them that was just dumb and wrong!  I wait for the day that I see, hear or read that you and the EE supporters say, although she is a great lady, she should not have notarized a signature without the presents of the person, no matter how sweet she is, I mean REALLY

I have NEVER said that it right to witness a signature when the person was not present.  However, I have said that Mrs. Esposito did what she did because she was trying to help a shut-in ...    you and your band of thugs have accused Mrs. Esposito of all kinds of horrendous things in regards to this.  
Bottomline - the old saying "no good deed goes unpunished" .. Mrs. Esposito tried to do a good deed and be helpful --- and the jackals (Parisi, Surprise and Rhinesmith) pounced on her.

So do you stand by your statement, Ron, that it was a "criminal conspiracy?"

Quoted from 1159

I'm sorry, but I don't get it! She went on medical leave (which she was entitled to do), thinking she was going to return ... how is that stealing? She obviously wanted to return to her job ... the one she did for over 30 years!
Have any of you taken sick leave from work?????

Get a new thread ... this horse is long dead!

First let's get one thing out of the way. I'm not KR.....I'm mertzie! KR doesn't need more than one alias....she says what she says and she means what she says. Funny......KR exposes corruptness from the democon camp in rotterdam and SHE IS THE BAD GUY!!! Only in rotterdam!!

Second, I think you are missing the point here. This is nothing more then the democons back peddling. EE committed the crime, went awol and continued to take rotterdam taxpayer's money. And adding insult to injury....the democons supported and defended her actions and continue to this day! The democons had their opportunity to lower EE's salary during the budget process but didn't. They continued to defend and support........reminiscent of the constantino days.

Quoted from 1159

So, HOW MANY pseudonyms does our Kelly hide behind, anyway?????!!!!! Talk about a fraud!!!!!

At last count about eight or nine.  She's a crafty son of gun.  She is not a nice person and will be dealing with another legal jackpot in the near future.  One that will hopefully put an end to her "life of deceipt and vengence."  Stupid is what stupid does and she boo booed big time.

Quoted from 487

At last count about eight or nine.  She's a crafty son of gun.  She is not a nice person and will be dealing with another legal jackpot in the near future.  One that will hopefully put an end to her "life of deceipt and vengence."  Stupid is what stupid does and she boo booed big time.

Ooohh Tony sounds like a threat to me....

Mr. Magdalene you have a lot of nerve--you hide in a dress.  KR isn't as crafty as she is bright.  The problem with you guys, is that you think she tries to control when the truth is you have all lost control over her.  I just heard she used to be a Democrat!  Wow--too shocking.

Not nearly as many as maceka has...peeper, zorro, etc.   He is the biggest loser of all

Quoted from marymagdelene1234

POA's can be in effect for all types of scenerios, not just mental incompetency.  The POA ends upon the
decedents death.  

then who is in charge of 'paying the estate' and filling the final taxes?

Quoted from senders

then who is in charge of 'paying the estate' and filling the final taxes?

This would be the Trustee of the Estate, which may or may not be the same person who held the POA, or it could be multiple people who have to handle it jointly.

Quoted from American Society of Notaries:

IMPORTANT: The “golden rule” of every notarial act, whether it is paper-based or electronic, is the physical presence of the signer before the notary.  A notary’s ability to fully evaluate a document signer’s identification, basic understanding of the transaction and free will would be diminished by any condition other than physical presence of the signer. No alternative, such as an audio/video connection, can provide the notary with full sensory experience that physical, personal presence allows.

The document signer must be PHYSICALLY PRESENT before the notary.
An essential element of the notarial act is personal, face-to-face communication between the document signer and the notary. This is necessary for the notary to assess the signer’s comprehension of the transaction and willingness to sign, to help ensure that neither coercion nor fraud are present, and to administer the required verbal ceremony. Physical presence of the signer is so important that notaries who fail to require it can be charged with a crime and punished.

The signer must be PERSONALLY KNOWN to the notary or must produce SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE OF IDENTIFICATION.One of the notary’s main responsibilities is to determine, beyond all reasonable doubt, that the person who has come for a notarial act is the same person named in the document as the signer. The signer must either be personally known to the notary (regular interaction over time has given the notary a deep-seated belief in the person’s identity); or the signer must present satisfactory evidence of identification, such as a state-issued driver’s license. The documents that a notary may accept as satisfactory evidence of identification vary by state but all states allow a current driver’s license. Some states also allow use of one or two credible witnesses to vouch for the identify of a signer, subject to the credible witness(es) ability to truthfully swear to a series of statements about the signer.

Joeboxer..........you don't seem to understand..........the rotterdam democons will support, defend and ignore the law.......that's what they did and continue to do.

Quoted from rampage

This would be the Trustee of the Estate, which may or may not be the same person who held the POA, or it could be multiple people who have to handle it jointly.

GOTCHA!!!! thanks