Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Another Liberal Dem Land Grab
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community     Chit Chat About Anything  ›  Another Liberal Dem Land Grab Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
Googlebot and 98 Guests

Another Liberal Dem Land Grab  This thread currently has 181 views. |
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
Shadow
March 3, 2010, 8:15am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
DEMINT: White House land grab
By Sen. Jim DeMint

You'd think the Obama administration is busy enough controlling the banks, insurance companies and automakers, but thanks to whistleblowers at the Department of the Interior, we now learn they're planning to increase their control over energy-rich land in the West.

A secret administration memo has surfaced revealing plans for the federal government to seize more than 10 million acres from Montana to New Mexico, halting job- creating activities like ranching, forestry, mining and energy development. Worse, this land grab would dry up tax revenue that's essential for funding schools, firehouses and community centers.

President Obama could enact the plans in this memo with just the stroke of a pen, without any input from the communities affected by it.

At a time when our national unemployment rate is 9.7 percent, it is unbelievable anyone would be looking to stop job-creating energy enterprises, yet that's exactly what's happening.

The document lists 14 properties that, according to the document, "might be good candidates" for Mr. Obama to nab through presidential proclamation. Apparently, Washington bureaucrats believe it's more important to preserve grass and rocks for birdwatchers and backpackers than to keep these local economies thriving.

Administration officials claim the document is merely the product of a brainstorming session, but anyone who reads this memo can see that it is a wish list for the environmentalist left. It discusses, in detail, what kinds of animal populations would benefit from limiting human activity in those areas.

The 21-page document, marked "Internal Draft-NOT FOR RELEASE," names 14 different lands Mr. Obama could completely close for development by unilaterally designating them as "monuments" under the 1906 Antiquities Act.

It says all kinds of animals would be better off by doing so, like the coyotes, badgers, grouse, chickens and lizards. But giving the chickens more room to roost is no reason for the government to override states' rights.

Rep. Robert Bishop, Utah Republican, made the memo public because he didn't want another unilateral land grab by the White House, like what happened under former Presidents Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter.

Using the Antiquities Act, President Carter locked up more land than any other president had before him, taking more than 50 million acres in Alaska despite strong opposition from the state.
Logged
Private Message
Sunnie57
March 4, 2010, 1:49am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Frightening! This should make us work harder at getting CONSERVATIVES elected to slow down Dictator Obama.

P.S. I LOVE Sen. DeMint!
Logged
E-mail Reply: 1 - 3
benny salami
March 4, 2010, 9:19am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
8,861
Reputation
68.97%
Reputation Score
+20 / -9
Time Online
132 days 23 hours 49 minutes
Senator DeMint is the best Senator in Congress. A real CONS not a McCain type double talker.

     If only we could have a Senator DeMint in this State. Instead of pathetic Schumer and Schumer's echo. Tiddle dee and twindle dum-dum.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 3
Kevin March
March 4, 2010, 2:04pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,071
Reputation
83.33%
Reputation Score
+10 / -2
Time Online
88 days 15 hours 44 minutes
I have actaully considered Senator DeMint my senator for a few years now.  I might as well with the representation I have up here.  Maybe I can be an honorary South Carolina resident.


Logged Offline
Site Private Message YIM Reply: 3 - 3
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread