Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Is Anti-Government Material Legal?
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community     Chit Chat About Anything  ›  Is Anti-Government Material Legal? Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
Googlebot and 86 Guests

Is Anti-Government Material Legal?  This thread currently has 304 views. |
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
Admin
June 5, 2009, 4:53am Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
Quoted Text
Hold the headlines on ‘anti-gov’t material’

    I was surprised and disappointed by the lead headline of the May 22 Saratoga edition, “Anti-gov’t material found in man’s arrest.” This is the type of headline I would expect to see in government-run newspapers in totalitarian countries, not in independent newspapers in democratic countries, and especially not in the United States.
    You must be aware of the First Amendment, and the fact that possession of “anti-government material” is not a violation of any law. It is quite shocking to see that our understanding of basic civil liberties has fallen to the point where writers at major newspapers believe possession of such material deserves to be reported at all, much less in a top-of-the-page headline.

    VICTOR ROBERTS
    Burnt Hills     


http://www.dailygazette.net/De.....amp;EntityId=Ar00706
Logged
Private Message
Shadow
June 5, 2009, 6:23am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
It's just the liberal press following their belief that anyone who has a different opinion than they do is either anti-government or racist.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 1 - 13
bumblethru
June 5, 2009, 7:43am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
Free speech was not designed to protect 'polite', 'politically correct' speech. It was actually created to protect the right of 'offensive' 'politically incorrect' speech.

Polite speech, obviously, did not need to be protected.


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 2 - 13
Admin
June 16, 2009, 5:08am Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
Quoted Text
Report certain info only when relevant to story

    I agree with Victor Roberts’ June 5 letter, “Hold the headlines on ‘anti-gov’t material.’” I have noticed that reporters (including the Gazette) will add information to their reports that has no relevance to the story.
    In his letter Mr. Roberts points out that in an article printed by the Gazette, when a man was arrested “anti-government material” was found, and he noted that possession of such material is not against the law and is protected by the First Amendment. It certainly is. So why include this information if no law has been broken?
    The problem I have has to do with our Second Amendment rights. I have noticed in some articles concerning the arrest of individuals that the reporter will add the fact that the police found “shotguns and rifles” during the arrest. Yeah, so? There is no mention that the person had them illegally. Nothing was said about the long guns being modified in any way to make them illegal, or if they were stolen, used in the act of another crime or were even loaded. The guns were just there.
    What is the point of this type of reporting? Are we to assume that because this person owns long guns, that he must be guilty of the crime for which he was arrested; or in the matter of possessing anti-government material, are we to think that this person is any less patriotic than anyone else?
    As an American citizen, if you choose to, you have the right to read Mao’s Little Red Book or Hitler’s “Mein Kampf,” and legally own as many shotguns and rifles that you can afford to buy (even in the state of New York). So why are these statements included?
    STEVEN CORNICK
    Rotterdam
     

http://www.dailygazette.net/De.....amp;EntityId=Ar00704
Logged
Private Message Reply: 3 - 13
Shadow
June 16, 2009, 5:31am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
The liberal media just loves to print information like that because to them anti government means anti Obama, their chosen one, and guns are evil whether they are legal or not. In a feeble effort to get more people to read their paper, which is slanted to the left so far no one will read it, the paper will sensationalize every story they can to improve the circulation IMHO.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 4 - 13
bumblethru
June 16, 2009, 8:53am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
Well, I guess I'm anti-government cause I don't agree with obama's platform and I own a gun!!


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 5 - 13
Salvatore
June 17, 2009, 11:34am Report to Moderator
Guest User
this is an infamita dn people should never go against their country or they are traitors over there
Logged
E-mail Reply: 6 - 13
Shadow
June 17, 2009, 1:07pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
We the people can demonstrate and take legal action against our government when said government fails to follow the Constitution to which they all took an oath to uphold.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 7 - 13
Salvatore
June 17, 2009, 4:32pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
I heard finally the government is going to close down the troublemakers who put things out that cause tensions in the country by limiting the traitors websights and radio show which in my opinion could naot have come 1 minute to soon. THANK YOU MR PRESIDENT THANK YOU AGAIN FOR STANDING UP FOR AMERICA AGAINST THE TRAITORS AND ANARCHIS
Logged
E-mail Reply: 8 - 13
Shadow
June 17, 2009, 5:18pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
Sal, I hate to say it but if that happens it could be a very dangerous move on governments part.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 9 - 13
senders
June 17, 2009, 5:50pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted from 191
I heard finally the government is going to close down the troublemakers who put things out that cause tensions in the country by limiting the traitors websights and radio show which in my opinion could naot have come 1 minute to soon. THANK YOU MR PRESIDENT THANK YOU AGAIN FOR STANDING UP FOR AMERICA AGAINST THE TRAITORS AND ANARCHIS


Does Hitler live in your closet? or do you have your own personal Czar? or maybe you are a Czar.......


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 10 - 13
Salvatore
June 18, 2009, 3:20pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
the best news I have heard is that they want to stop the terrorists from putting out the things against the government the people who are the gun toters and redknecks and born agains who are th e most dangerous who want to hurt people and the leaders to
Logged
E-mail Reply: 11 - 13
Shadow
June 18, 2009, 7:03pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
Be careful Sal there are a lot of people out there that fit that description. Remember when Senders always says, those with the guns control the masses.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 12 - 13
senders
June 18, 2009, 8:02pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted from 191
the best news I have heard is that they want to stop the terrorists from putting out the things against the government the people who are the gun toters and redknecks and born agains who are th e most dangerous who want to hurt people and the leaders to


then who needs a gun, when you have baptism via drowning.....?
Cain and Able didn't have guns.....


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 13 - 13
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread