it's your call.......you are the ONE.

Quoted from Patches

it's your call.......you are the ONE.

So then you were serious. And how are the victims to be compensated?

assumption.....analyze.......conclusion.......in your opinion only.......

Quoted from Patches

assumption.....analyze.......conclusion.......in your opinion only.......

I'm trying to be civil and carry on an intelligent conversation, and you reply with drivel. You really should take your own advice.

Ah well, I did try. And with that being said I will simply say that in my opinion you are a dolt. Good day.

Quoted from Patches

assumption.....analyze.......conclusion.......in your opinion only.......

Huh? And your previous post doesn't make any sense to me. Just because his superiors knew and didn't stop him does not
mean he should get a pension. The fact that they didn't stop him does not mean he is entitled to a pension as a reward for his
behavior that no one stopped? What? Really?

The man is a terrorist. He does not deserve a pension, pay the victims. Then his wife can have the leftovers.
She certainlydoes not need eighty freakin' thousand dollars a year to live!!!

Quoted from Ididntdoit

Huh? And your previous post doesn't make any sense to me. Just because his superiors knew and didn't stop him does not
mean he should get a pension. The fact that they didn't stop him does not mean he is entitled to a pension as a reward for his
behavior that no one stopped? What? Really?

The man is a terrorist. He does not deserve a pension, pay the victims. Then his wife can have the leftovers.
She certainlydoes not need eighty freakin' thousand dollars a year to live!!!

In Patches' world the wife is the only victim.

LET THE GUMBAS PAY

ok.....but it's ok that these government people have double triple and so on dipping....who are the victims now.........does any of them need 80K to live on???

if the shoe was on your foot then what.......the victims yes should get paid....but yes the family was the victim too....

share it then.....but don';t give me the hooey that the family doesn't deserve something....this is what happens ...they have suffered too.....at least the perp

got caught before a Real tradegy ......it was close wasn't it.....it was covered up for a long time...and maybe those who knew and didn't do anything should share

their pensions too..lets' be fair and be real.....shove some things under the rug....

squawk about an issue as mentioned above.....give some shouts about that.....double triple and more dipping......

I am not a droll or whatever.....just someone who tries to see things with some empathy...

Quoted from Patches

ok.....but it's ok that these government people have double triple and so on dipping....who are the victims now.........does any of them need 80K to live on???

if the shoe was on your foot then what.......the victims yes should get paid....but yes the family was the victim too....

share it then.....but don';t give me the hooey that the family doesn't deserve something....this is what happens ...they have suffered too.....at least the perp

got caught before a Real tradegy ......it was close wasn't it.....it was covered up for a long time...and maybe those who knew and didn't do anything should share

their pensions too..lets' be fair and be real.....shove some things under the rug....

squawk about an issue as mentioned above.....give some shouts about that.....double triple and more dipping......

I am not a droll or whatever.....just someone who tries to see things with some empathy...

Dolt is the term, and it still applies. The guy was a terrorist. He's the one who should've thought about his wife's situation. People were scarred for life. Let the wife go get a job for crying out loud.

[quote=1840]


ok.....but it's ok that these government people have double triple and so on dipping....




The topic of this thread is Raucci.

Not entirely your fault Patches but every thread on this board goes off topic and it's on and on about the same thing no matter
what the original poster posted about. It's getting old and it is boring.

IDDI....don't fret...I don/t....thanks for the boost....but this person is a know it all.....and the threads do get off the subject.....but sometimes you get

responses that you just have to laugh at....if this person can surmise, alledge and voice an opinion....the fair way would be to take it all in.....yes, give an

opinion.....without the name calling.....so how classey is this person....intelligent??.....not in my book.....so that these people make sure they try to put you down

to their level......all of a sudden this whole blog has turned into low level dialogue that most of the time you can't understand.....

So in closing.....thanks...have a nice day....and for those that don't have faith...Bless you all.....anyway....

PS....the negative % on my name...really makes me laugh.....now one knows who is putting it there....LOL.......

Quoted from Ididntdoit

[quote=1840]


ok.....but it's ok that these government people have double triple and so on dipping....




The topic of this thread is Raucci.

Not entirely your fault Patches but every thread on this board goes off topic and it's on and on about the same thing no matter
what the original poster posted about. It's getting old and it is boring.

Ididntdoit, my apologies for getting off topic, it was out of frustration. But I must point out, that I am not the one who strayed from the Raucci topic. To wit:

I replied to this statement:

Quoted from Patches

his family has to live.....he committed the crime and no one stood up until it was almost too late...

I support the family's rights....what if he had died before he was found guilty.....who would get his pension then....and.....that could have happened..

kinda likened to what is going on today in our government.....lies, greed, and deceit...

leave his pension to his family.....yes the taxpayers have to pay for him....because the people who could have prevented all this didn't......bottom line...

with a tongue in cheek reply.

Quoted from 3303

I assume that this is tongue in cheek. Am I correct?

I believe that we were still on topic. The response I received was this:

Quoted from Patches

it's your call.......you are the ONE.

How is even remotely on topic. I was curious if the poster was serious when I asked my sarcastic question. My next reply was an attempt to come back to the topic at hand, and I asked.

Quoted from 3303

So then you were serious. And how are the victims to be compensated?

I was on topic. The next reply I received was this.

Quoted from Patches

assumption.....analyze.......conclusion.......in your opinion only.......

On topic? I think not. And at this point I became frustrated, for the poster wouldn't reply in a civilized manner and so I vented my frustration with this.

Quoted from 3303

I'm trying to be civil and carry on an intelligent conversation, and you reply with drivel. You really should take your own advice.

Ah well, I did try. And with that being said I will simply say that in my opinion you are a dolt. Good day.

And yes this has nothing to do with Raucci, but was nothing more than the frustrations of a senior citizen at being ignored. I apologize once again, not for the statement or who it was directed to, but for going off topic.

You replied to the poster basically agreeing that their original statement was ridiculous. I agree with your assessment totally. I made other statements about the poster, but included on topic statements as well. I will say no more on the subject of the poster who originally took us off topic. It's not worth the effort.

To the topic of Mr. Raucci and his pension. It is criminal that a convicted felon is allowed to collect a pension. He was committing terrorist acts while money was being contributed to his pension fund. Why on earth should I feel bad for his wife, if his pension were to be removed and diverted to victims of his heinous actions? Has she made any effort to aid the victims of her husbands crimes? Has she sold her home and contributed to a victims fund? My only empathy towards Mrs. Raucci is that she hitched her wagon to the wrong horse. That's her problem not the victims.

I am sick and tired of criminals somehow being portrayed as victims. If their spouses are somehow forced to endure hardships, then perhaps the criminals should have considered this before committing their crimes. Who's the real victim here? Mr. Raucci and his family who receive $80,000 annually? Or the poor souls who were victimized by the cowardly Mr. Raucci?

ok ok  LOKI....are you the moderator or what.....get down off your high donkey.....

Quoted from Patches

ok ok  LOKI....are you the moderator or what.....get down off your high donkey.....

off topic

aaaahhhhh, the donkey has left the building with DVOR