Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Obama's $850 Billion Stimulus Plan
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community     Chit Chat About Anything  ›  Obama's $850 Billion Stimulus Plan Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 119 Guests

Obama's $850 Billion Stimulus Plan  This thread currently has 266 views. |
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
Admin
December 18, 2008, 5:42am Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
Quoted Text
Obama assembling $850B stimulus plan
BY JIM KUHNHENN The Associated Press

    WASHINGTON — Eager to jolt a worsening economy back to life, President-elect Barack Obama’s aides are assembling a two-year stimulus package that could cost $850 billion, dwarfing last spring’s tax rebates and rivaling drastic government actions to fight the Great Depression.
    The emerging plan is a blend of new jobs, middle-class tax relief and expanded aid for the poor and the unemployed, congressional officials said Wednesday.
    Obama has not settled on a grand total, and the fi nal figure could be smaller. But after consulting with outside economists of all political stripes, his advisers have begun telling Congress the stimulus should be bigger than the $600 billion initially envisioned, the officials said.
    Obama is promoting a recovery plan that would feature spending on roads and other infrastructure projects, energy-efficient government buildings, new and renovated schools and environmentally friendly technologies.
    There would also be some form of tax relief, according to the Obama team, which is well aware of the political difficulty of pushing such a large package through Congress, even in a time of recession. Any tax cuts would be aimed at middle- and lower-income taxpayers, and aides have said there would be no tax increases for wealthy Americans.
    While some economists consulted by Obama’s team recommended spending of up to $1 trillion over two years, a more likely figure seems to be $850 billion. There is concern that a package that looks too large could worry financial markets, and the incoming economic team also wants to signal fiscal restraint.
    In addition to spending on roads, bridges and similar construction projects, Obama is expected to seek additional funds for numerous programs that experience increased demand when joblessness rises, one Democratic official said.
    Among those programs are food stamps and other nutrition programs, health insurance, unemployment insurance and job training programs.
    Obama advisers, including Christina Romer and Lawrence Summers, have been contacting economists from across the political spectrum in search of advice as they assemble a spending plan that would meet Obama’s goal of preserving or creating 2.5 million jobs over two years.
    Among those whose opinions Obama sought were Lawrence B. Lindsey, a top economic adviser to President George W. Bush during his first term, and Harvard professor Martin Feldstein, an informal adviser to John McCain and the chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers under President Ronald Reagan.
    Feldstein recommended a $400 billion investment in one year, Obama aides said, and Lindsey said the package should be in the range of $800 billion to $1 trillion. The aides revealed the discussions on condition of anonymity because no decisions had been reached.
    “I do recommend $400 billion in year one and expect a similar amount in year two,” Feldstein said in an e-mail. “The right amount depends on how it is used.”
    Lindsey could not be reached.
    Obama aides also pointed to recommendations by Mark Zandi, the lead economist at Moody’s Economy.com  and an informal McCain adviser who has been proposing a $600 billion plan.
    “I would err on the side of making it larger than making it smaller,” Zandi said in an interview. “The size of the plan depends on the forecast — the economic outlook — and that is darkening by the day.”
    “Even a trillion is not inconceivable,” he said.
    Only one outside economist contacted by Obama aides, Harvard’s Greg Mankiw, who served on Bush’s Council of Economic Advisers, voiced skepticism about the need for an economic stimulus, transition officials said.
    The advisers say they agree with economic forecasts that predict that without a government infusion unemployment will rise above 9 percent and not begin to come down until 2011.
    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Wednesday that Obama has indicated that Congress will get his recovery recommendations by the first of the year.
    “He’s going to get that to us very quickly and so we would hope within the first 10 days to two weeks that he’s in office, that is after Jan. 20, that we could pass the stimulus plan,” Reid said. “We want to do it very quickly.”
    In a letter to Peter Orszag, Obama’s choice to be White House budget chief, Reid asked, among other things, that the stimulus package include tax relief for middle-class families, including a reduction in rates and an extension of the child tax credit.
    Obama’s aides have said they hope to work with Republicans in writing the bill, particularly in the Senate, where the GOP could slow action if it chooses. This week, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Democrats were preparing their own recovery bill in the range of $600 billion, blending immediate steps to counter the slumping economy with longer-term federal spending that encompasses Obama’s plan.
    A stimulus package that approaches $1 trillion could run into significant Republican opposition in Congress. It also could cause heartburn for moderate and conservative Democratic lawmakers, known as Blue Dogs, who oppose large budget deficits.
    “Republicans want to work with the president-elect to help get our economy on the path to recovery, but we have grave reservations about taking $1 trillion from struggling taxpayers and spending it on government programs in the name of economic ’stimulus,’” House Republican leader John Boehner said in a statement.
    In February, Congress passed an economic stimulus bill costing $168 billion and featuring $600 tax rebates for most individual taxpayers and.........http://www.dailygazette.net/De.....amp;EntityId=Ar00600
Logged
Private Message
Shadow
December 18, 2008, 6:59am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
It looks like a giant welfare program to me.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 1 - 2
senders
December 18, 2008, 8:28pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
There are a bunch of boomers with nothing left to buy but a retirement home and longterm care insurance and the rest of the population are way over
their heads in debt.....so..........what will it be??????

where do we go from here???? yup,,,new blood........where does it come from?


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 2
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread