Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
$700B In Bail Outs - TARP
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community     Chit Chat About Anything  ›  $700B In Bail Outs - TARP Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 117 Guests

$700B In Bail Outs - TARP  This thread currently has 10,120 views. |
21 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ... » Recommend Thread
MobileTerminal
September 29, 2008, 12:34pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
This is going to get very interesting, very quickly I fear.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 75 - 307
MobileTerminal
September 29, 2008, 12:47pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted Text
U.S. Rep. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-Greenport, was among those in the House of Representatives who voted down a proposed $700 billion bailout of the financial services industry Monday, said her chief of staff, Jess Fassler.

Fassler said Gillibrand would issue a statement explaining her vote.

House members ignored urgent pleas from President Bush and bipartisan congressional leaders to quickly bail out the staggering financial services industry. Bush and a host of leading congressional figures had implored the lawmakers to pass the legislation despite howls of protest from their constituents back home.

When the critical vote was tallied, too few members of the House were willing to support the unpopular measure with elections just five weeks away. Ample no votes came from both the Democratic and Republican sides of the aisle.


http://dailygazette.com/news/2008/sep/29/0929_bailout/
Logged
E-mail Reply: 76 - 307
mikechristine1
September 29, 2008, 12:57pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
9,074
Reputation
71.88%
Reputation Score
+23 / -9
Time Online
99 days 18 hours 36 minutes
OK people grumble about the bail out.    Now the bail out seems to be voted down.

What are the ramifications with it voted down?   Arent’ we then in more serious trouble?


Optimists close their eyes and pretend problems are non existent.  
Better to have open eyes, see the truths, acknowledge the negatives, and
speak up for the people rather than the politicos and their rich cronies.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 77 - 307
MobileTerminal
September 29, 2008, 1:27pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
What I'm having a problem with is that Pelosi and the Democrats are all over TV blaming the Republicans for voting it down.

BUT ... democrats control both houses - and >40% of the democrats voted AGAINST this.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 78 - 307
Shadow
September 29, 2008, 5:41pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
THEY GAVE YOUR MORTGAGE TO A LESS QUALIFIED MINORITY
September 24, 2008


On MSNBC this week, Newsweek's Jonathan Alter tried to connect John McCain to the current financial disaster, saying: "If you remember the Keating Five scandal that (McCain) was a part of. ... He's really getting a free ride on the fact that he was in the middle of the last great financial scandal in our country."

McCain was "in the middle of" the Keating Five case in the sense that he was "exonerated." The lawyer for the Senate Ethics Committee wanted McCain removed from the investigation altogether, but, as The New York Times reported: "Sen. McCain was the only Republican embroiled in the affair, and Democrats on the panel would not release him."

So John McCain has been held hostage by both the Viet Cong and the Democrats.

Alter couldn't be expected to know that: As usual, he was lifting material directly from Kausfiles. What is unusual was that he was stealing a random thought sent in by Kausfiles' mother, who, the day before, had e-mailed: "It's time to bring up the Keating Five. Let McCain explain that scandal away."

The Senate Ethics Committee lawyer who investigated McCain already had explained that scandal away -- repeatedly. It was celebrated lawyer Robert Bennett, most famous for defending a certain horny hick president a few years ago.

In February this year, on Fox News' "Hannity and Colmes," Bennett said, for the eight billionth time:

"First, I should tell your listeners I'm a registered Democrat, so I'm not on (McCain's) side of a lot of issues. But I investigated John McCain for a year and a half, at least, when I was special counsel to the Senate Ethics Committee in the Keating Five. ... And if there is one thing I am absolutely confident of, it is John McCain is an honest man. I recommended to the Senate Ethics Committee that he be cut out of the case, that there was no evidence against him."

It's bad enough for Alter to be constantly ripping off Kausfiles. Now he's so devoid of his own ideas, he's ripping off the idle musings of Kausfiles' mother.

Even if McCain had been implicated in the Keating Five scandal -- and he wasn't -- that would still have absolutely nothing to do with the subprime mortgage crisis currently roiling the financial markets. This crisis was caused by political correctness being forced on the mortgage lending industry in the Clinton era.

Before the Democrats' affirmative action lending policies became an embarrassment, the Los Angeles Times reported that, starting in 1992, a majority-Democratic Congress "mandated that Fannie and Freddie increase their purchases of mortgages for low-income and medium-income borrowers. Operating under that requirement, Fannie Mae, in particular, has been aggressive and creative in stimulating minority gains."

Under Clinton, the entire federal government put massive pressure on banks to grant more mortgages to the poor and minorities. Clinton's secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Andrew Cuomo, investigated Fannie Mae for racial discrimination and proposed that 50 percent of Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's portfolio be made up of loans to low- to moderate-income borrowers by the year 2001.

Instead of looking at "outdated criteria," such as the mortgage applicant's credit history and ability to make a down payment, banks were encouraged to consider nontraditional measures of credit-worthiness, such as having a good jump shot or having a missing child named "Caylee."

Threatening lawsuits, Clinton's Federal Reserve demanded that banks treat welfare payments and unemployment benefits as valid income sources to qualify for a mortgage. That isn't a joke -- it's a fact.

When Democrats controlled both the executive and legislative branches, political correctness was given a veto over sound business practices.

In 1999, liberals were bragging about extending affirmative action to the financial sector. Los Angeles Times reporter Ron Brownstein hailed the Clinton administration's affirmative action lending policies as one of the "hidden success stories" of the Clinton administration, saying that "black and Latino homeownership has surged to the highest level ever recorded."

Meanwhile, economists were screaming from the rooftops that the Democrats were forcing mortgage lenders to issue loans that would fail the moment the housing market slowed and deadbeat borrowers couldn't get out of their loans by selling their houses.

A decade later, the housing bubble burst and, as predicted, food-stamp-backed mortgages collapsed. Democrats set an affirmative action time-bomb and now it's gone off.

In Bush's first year in office, the White House chief economist, N. Gregory Mankiw, warned that the government's "implicit subsidy" of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, combined with loans to unqualified borrowers, was creating a huge risk for the entire financial system.

Rep. Barney Frank denounced Mankiw, saying he had no "concern about housing." How dare you oppose suicidal loans to people who can't repay them! The New York Times reported that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were "under heavy assault by the Republicans," but these entities still had "important political allies" in the Democrats.

Now, at a cost of hundreds of billions of dollars, middle-class taxpayers are going to be forced to bail out the Democrats' two most important constituent groups: rich Wall Street bankers and welfare recipients.

Political correctness had already ruined education, sports, science and entertainment. But it took a Democratic president with a Democratic congress for political correctness to wreck the financial industry.

COPYRIGHT 2008 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE
4520 Main Street, Kansas City, MO 64111
Logged
Private Message Reply: 79 - 307
Sombody
September 29, 2008, 6:14pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
2,049
Reputation
63.64%
Reputation Score
+7 / -4
Time Online
1813 days 10 hours 41 minutes
Quoted from 147
What I'm having a problem with is that Pelosi and the Democrats are all over TV blaming the Republicans for voting it down.

BUT ... democrats control both houses - and >40% of the democrats voted AGAINST this.


Democrats voted 140 to 95 in favor of the legislation, while just 65 Republicans backed the bill and 133 opposed it.


Oneida Elementary K-2  Yates 3-6
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 80 - 307
MobileTerminal
September 29, 2008, 6:40pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted from Sombody


Democrats voted 140 to 95 in favor of the legislation, while just 65 Republicans backed the bill and 133 opposed it.


I understand that ... but that's still 40% that DIDN'T vote for it ... they have the majority - why couldn't they get this passed?
Logged
E-mail Reply: 81 - 307
Sombody
September 29, 2008, 7:07pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
2,049
Reputation
63.64%
Reputation Score
+7 / -4
Time Online
1813 days 10 hours 41 minutes
The plan stunk anyhow


Oneida Elementary K-2  Yates 3-6
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 82 - 307
bumblethru
September 29, 2008, 7:17pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
I think that all who voted no to this ridiculous bail out, for whatever reason, should be commended. I am a believer in the free market and capitalism and allowing it to adjust and correct itself. I also believe in accountability and consequences for all the greedy bast**ds that allowed this to happen and get rich from it.

So I do not want this country to lose it's free market, capitalism foundation for the greedy few. WE WILL SURVIVE!!


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 83 - 307
senders
September 29, 2008, 7:26pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Get ready for the babylon tower to topple......as for the rest of us.....we dont have far to go......those that are Paris Hilton's BFF's will feel a pinch.....
those folks expect caviar at the highest level......I can eat potatoes and pasta every day......there is a chasim and those elected are playing tug-o-war
over it........let's see who is real and who is not......dont let the parties fool you....just because they stretch out their hand doesn't mean they will
finish it......we are PIONEERING AMERICANS and let's not forget that........the system is what the system is.....people will ALWAYS trade and barter that is
what we are......the CONTROL of that is what the minority on top fight for........the smoke is clearing for a short time....everyone better take a good
look and see....then listen and hear..........


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 84 - 307
Michael
September 29, 2008, 7:55pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
533
Reputation
0.00%
Reputation Score
+0 / -2
Time Online
8 days 6 hours 23 minutes
Quoted from bumblethru
I think that all who voted no to this ridiculous bail out, for whatever reason, should be commended. I am a believer in the free market and capitalism and allowing it to adjust and correct itself. I also believe in accountability and consequences for all the greedy bast**ds that allowed this to happen and get rich from it.

So I do not want this country to lose it's free market, capitalism foundation for the greedy few. WE WILL SURVIVE!!


You will survive...long enough to regret them not passing it.  I responded more fully though not completely on Kevin's blog.  I'll post my own piece eventually on my blog.



No New Taxes.
Logged
Site Private Message Reply: 85 - 307
Michael
September 29, 2008, 7:56pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
533
Reputation
0.00%
Reputation Score
+0 / -2
Time Online
8 days 6 hours 23 minutes
Quoted from Sombody
The plan stunk anyhow


No plan stinks more.



No New Taxes.
Logged
Site Private Message Reply: 86 - 307
Michael
September 29, 2008, 7:59pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
533
Reputation
0.00%
Reputation Score
+0 / -2
Time Online
8 days 6 hours 23 minutes
Quoted from mikechristine1
OK people grumble about the bail out.    Now the bail out seems to be voted down.

What are the ramifications with it voted down?   Arent’ we then in more serious trouble?


The consequences of not passing a bailout grow more serious each day.  Think Road Warrior.  See my comment on Kevin's most recent blog post.



No New Taxes.
Logged
Site Private Message Reply: 87 - 307
Michael
September 29, 2008, 8:07pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
533
Reputation
0.00%
Reputation Score
+0 / -2
Time Online
8 days 6 hours 23 minutes
Quoted from bumblethru
Nothing needs to be done. This government has already put into place a nation built on capitalism. Let capitalism correct itself. For the first time in this generation let us all stop for a minute and think about future generations and stop the 'IT'S ALL ABOUT ME' mentality. THAT is what got us in this spot to begin with. So it is time for US to pay the piper. And for those in 'higher places' that caused this collapse...their heads should roll.


You're dead wrong, in my opinion.  If you think you'll feel pain as a taxpayer because of a bailout, you'll feel 100x more pain w/o one.  You say "recession- been there, done that."  Ever done a Depression?  The last one will look like a walk in the park in comparison to what we're on the brink of.


No New Taxes.
Logged
Site Private Message Reply: 88 - 307
CICERO
September 29, 2008, 8:30pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Michael


You're dead wrong, in my opinion.  If you think you'll feel pain as a taxpayer because of a bailout, you'll feel 100x more pain w/o one.  You say "recession- been there, done that."  Ever done a Depression?  The last one will look like a walk in the park in comparison to what we're on the brink of.


Those who are really sweating are the boomers closing in on retirement age.  Their dreams of a summer home in Florida or enjoying their golden years RVing across the country have been dashed away.  People in their 20's and 30's look at this as a buying opportunity, since they still have enough time to recover their losses before retirement.  Sure things are going to be tough in this depressed economy, but then again I've lived in upstate NY my whole life and it's been a depressed economy for the past 25 years.  



Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 89 - 307
21 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ... » Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread